I had a sock crisis this week that I am still trying to resolve. It involved my being daring enough to try something new for the legs, and then paying heavily for my temerity. So much for my plan to knit one pair of socks each month of this year. Do you realize how discouraging it is that it is only January, and I am already falling behind?
This will be me, only w/out the elaborate headdress. |
Oooh, but look, there's one in Chicago this August! Take a gander at the classes offered - Mobius Mysteries Untangled, Seams Made Simple, Sweater "Boot Camp" - who could resist? Looks like I will have to, though, as this particular extravaganza would set me back $400 plus hotel and travel. I don't understand how knitters, who tend to spend all their spare cash on every enticing skein of merino that comes along, manage to afford these retreats. Oh, yes, they have jobs and all that...and I guess they don't waste all their money on evicting bats from their houses...but still, upwards of $700 for 3 days of knitting?
Hmmm, I wonder if the kids really need to eat this summer...
Fiber arts. Where I'm from, that's totally a dietary reference. You make the phrase sound way cooler.
ReplyDeleteYou should have been with me in the car the other day, when I was listening to a commercial for "FIBER! Coming to your town!" It was for fiberoptic internet, but it could totally have been pimping yarn. I laughed and laughed.
DeleteAnd SC? I don't get the $700 either, and I could theoretically afford it. I mean, I can get a pile of knitting books from the library and spend the weekend at home with a pile of free yarn having a knitting weekend that costs me nothing.
ReplyDeleteThe trick is to get everyone else to agree that you're on a RETREAT while you're having that knitting weekend… including yourself. So hard to ignore the piteous cries for attention, and food, and all that other stuff families tend to expect...
ReplyDeleteThis is so me except with cross stitch and very bad TV!
ReplyDeleteThat doesn't even sound fun. Just go to Vegas or something instead.
ReplyDelete